Email #129: “ignore the Constitution”?

You accused President Obama of using “his pen and phone to stretch his authority to implement policies that Congress has refused to enact.”

You said that President Obama showed “time and again throughout his time in office that he is all-too-willing to overstep his authority and ignore the Constitution to achieve his policy goals.”

You said that your House Judiciary Committee “has a duty to conduct vigorous oversight” of the executive branch, ensuring that it is “bound by its constitutional limits.”

“The Constitution is clear,” you said: “it is the role of Congress to make all laws, the Judiciary to interpret the laws, and the President to enforce the laws.”

Given your outspoken condemnation of President Obama on these Constitutional matters, why are you not applying the same vigor in your oversight of the Trump administration? Two of the President’s executive orders require the hiring of 5,000 new border patrol agents and 10,000 new immigration officers, for a combined annual cost of $4.8 billion. Another orders the construction of his promised “Great Wall” along the U.S.-Mexico border, allocating unspecified “Federal funds for the planning, designing, and constructing of a physical wall along the southern border,” for a likely $25 billion.

But only Congress has the power to spend taxpayer money. No President can spend money that Congress hasn’t authorized. Trump, like Obama and every President before them, can then only shift around dollars within budgetary line-items. And yet President Trump’s executive orders call for new spending not authorized by Congress.

When Obama signed executive orders, you and other members of the Republican party often accused him of violating the Constitution. So far President Trump has signed 19 executive orders, many of which require unauthorized spending. But I have yet to hear you even mildly suggest that the President might be “stretching” or “overstepping” his authority, let alone violating the Constitution.

Do your Constitutional standards vary according to which political party is in the White House? Is your guidepost the Constitution or just political convenience?


Author: Chris Gavaler

Chris Gavaler is an assistant professor of English at Washington and Lee University where he teaches creative writing, contemporary fiction, and comics. He has published two novels, Pretend I'm Not Here (HarperCollins 2002) and School For Tricksters (Southern Methodist University 2011), and two nonfictions, On the Origin of Superheroes (Iowa University 2015) and Superhero Comics (Bloomsbury forthcoming 2017).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s