Email #125: “regulate the economy”?

A new poll shows that Americans view the economy not through verifiable facts but through the lens of their political parties. “We’ve never recorded this before,” said the director of the University of Michigan’s consumer poll: “the partisan divide has never had as large an impact on consumers’ economic expectations.”

While the polarizing effects of the last election and Trump’s continuingly divisive presidency may be the biggest factor, you’ve done your part too. You wrote in one of your past newsletters:

“The Obama Administration’s attempt over the last eight years to regulate the economy back to prosperity was the wrong approach.”

The verb “regulate” is a rhetorical device to imply that President Obama’s only method for tackling the economy was creating new regulations. This is obviously not true, and so it is disturbing to see you so casually imply a false statement. Worse, you directly state that President Obama’s economic policies overall were “wrong.” This is verifiably false. As you know, the GDP growth was up for 25 of the last 27 quarters of his presidency, with 76 consecutive months of jobs growth.

There’s plenty to criticize too, since the percent of growth was low. Still, Obama entered office at the onset of the Great Recession, and a Republican Congress, yourself included, halted his economic growth policies two years later. So why didn’t your newsletter column “The Price Tag of Federal Regulation” acknowledge the Republican role in the economic condition of the country, especially the policies of the Bush Administration that triggered the recession that Obama inherited?

Your treatment of facts is disturbing. We have a President who routinely lies. I say that objectively. According to multiple fact-checking sources, President Trump regularly makes false statements, calling them “truthful hyperboles” or “euphemisms” or “alternate facts.” Whatever you call them, they destroy public trust. And rather than addressing that problem, your own statements are adding to it, further dividing the country–even on issues as factually verifiable as the state of the economy.

You told me elected officials should be held to the highest standards. Please apply that principle to your own rhetoric. There’s far more at stake than partisan squabbling. You can either help to heal America’s blinding political divide, or you can keep widening that gap to score meaningless partisan points at a deepening cost to our nation.


Author: Chris Gavaler

Chris Gavaler is an associate professor at W&L University, comics editor of Shenandoah, and series editor of Bloomsbury Critical Guides in Comics Studies. He has published two novels: School for Tricksters (SMU 2011) and Pretend I’m Not Here (HarperCollins 2002); and six books of scholarship: On the Origin of Superheroes (Iowa 2015), Superhero Comics (Bloomsbury 2017), Superhero Thought Experiments (with Nathaniel Goldberg, Iowa 2019), Revising Fiction, Fact, and Faith (with Nathaniel Goldberg, Routledge 2020), Creating Comics (with Leigh Ann Beavers, Bloomsbury 2021), and The Comics Form (Bloomsbury forthcoming). His visual work appears in Ilanot Review, North American Review, Aquifer, and other journals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: