When you wrote to me last month about the new ACA replacement bill, you said: “This plan notably includes proposals to protect access to coverage for individuals with pre-existing conditions, allows dependents under the age of 26 to stay on their parents’ plans, and removes lifetime limits on coverage.”
But now I read that the bill would allow insurers to raises their prices for people with pre-existing conditions. In what sense does that “protect access”? The ACA eliminated the whole concept of pre-existing conditions, but the GOP bill would bring it back so that companies can charge 30% higher premiums.
Worse, the new bill would allow insurers to set lifetime limits—even though you said before it would not. Under the ACA, insurers can’t set arbitrary caps and so abandon the people who most need health care, those with terrible, long-term diseases. The new bill would reinstate that immoral practice.
When I called your office to ask about this last Friday, your staffer told me that you had not taken a position on the new health care bill yet and were still reviewing it. Since it violates two of your stated priorities, may I assume that you will not be voting for it? Otherwise your letter highlighting the importance of pre-existing conditions and lifetime caps was meaningless.
Since it was a form letter, I assume you sent copies to all of your constituents who contacted your office about Obamacare in the last several weeks. Given the historic surge in calls and letters to Congress this year, I can only imagine how may people that is. It would be especially disturbing then if you contradicted your own letter now that we can all see the deep shortcomings of the GOP replacement bill.
Since the weekend must have given you ample time to complete your review of the American Health Care Act, I look forward to your next press release announcing your disapproval. All of your constituents trust you to stand by your words and permanently eliminate pre-existing conditions and lifetime limits.