Email #68, Subject: business and politics?

In addition to breaking his campaign promise to release his taxes after the election and so reveal his conflicts of interests, the President has openly criticized the Nordstrom company for cancelling his daughter’s clothing line. This caused an immediate though brief drop in Nordstrom’s stocks. Press Secretary Spicer defended the President’s tweet, arguing that Nordstrom was attacking the President.

I don’t know if Nordstrom dropped the clothing line because of weak sales, fear of a boycott by anti-Trump buyers, or its own political differences with the President. Whatever their reason, however, they are within their rights. Kellyanne Conway, however, stepped well outside her rights as a White House spokesperson when she endorsed the clothing line: “Go buy Ivanka’s stuff, is what I would tell you. It’s a wonderful line. I own some of it. I fully — I’m going to just, I’m going to give a free commercial here: Go buy it today, everybody. You can find it online.”

Since government employees are barred from endorsing private businesses, Conway’s statement violates ethics rules. As you of course know, the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee has reported Conway to the Office of Government Ethics. At first I thought this was the same Ethics Office that your failed amendment would have stripped of its non-partisan independence last month, but I believe that was the Office of Congressional Ethics, which of course could not reprimand, suspend, demote or dismiss Conway as the Oversight chair has demanded.

Given the poor national reaction you and your amendment received then, and your continuing role as chair of the ethics-focused House Judiciary Committee, as well as your stated reelection priority to check the executive branch, I am confused that you have not responded to either Conway’s or the President’s statements. Are you at all concerned about the White House’s merging of political and business interests? If not, would you please give your interpretation of the Nordstrom situation and explain what exactly for you would constitute an ethics violation? What more would Conway or the President need to do in order for you to criticize them?

Chris Gavaler

Author: Chris Gavaler

Chris Gavaler is an associate professor at W&L University, comics editor of Shenandoah, and series editor of Bloomsbury Critical Guides in Comics Studies. He has published two novels: School for Tricksters (SMU 2011) and Pretend I’m Not Here (HarperCollins 2002); and six books of scholarship: On the Origin of Superheroes (Iowa 2015), Superhero Comics (Bloomsbury 2017), Superhero Thought Experiments (with Nathaniel Goldberg, Iowa 2019), Revising Fiction, Fact, and Faith (with Nathaniel Goldberg, Routledge 2020), Creating Comics (with Leigh Ann Beavers, Bloomsbury 2021), and The Comics Form (Bloomsbury forthcoming). His visual work appears in Ilanot Review, North American Review, Aquifer, and other journals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: