Email #53, Subject: “open door” meetings?

Why are you misleading your constituents about something as simple as meeting opportunities? Your website includes a page called “Open Door Meetings” with the following description: “Each month a member of Congressman Goodlatte’s staff travels to several communities throughout the Sixth District to discuss issues or problems you might have with the federal government.” Each Open Door Meeting is scheduled for ninety minutes, and I attended the one in Lexington last week. As each person entered, the staffer asked them if they were here with “the group” or for a “case study.” Everyone, including myself, was confused by the question. We slowly came to understand that the “Open Door Meeting” advertised on the website was not the staffer’s priority. Instead she would first have closed door meetings with any individuals who had private problems. If there were no private concerns, only then would she conduct the “Open Door Meeting.”  The scheduled ninety-minute “Open Door Meeting” lasted only forty-five minutes, because the staffer ended it as soon as someone arrived with a closed-door concern. If that individual had arrived earlier, the staffer would have ended the Open Door Meeting that much sooner. In fact, she said, she would not have held the Open Door Meeting at all and attended only to individuals if several had been there at the start of the period.

Why do you schedule opportunities to have private closed door meeting during the block of time advertised as an “Open Door Meeting” on your website? Could you please correct this information on your website to avoid further confusion and frustration in the future? Moreover, your website states the Open Door Meetings are “to discuss issues.” The staffer instead said that there would be no discussion of any kind. She would only write down our concerns and communicate them to you. In what possible sense does her taking dictation constitute a “discussion”? Again, please correct the information on your website before the next “Open Door Meeting” scheduled in February. I would be unfortunate and unecessary for the confusion and frustration to occur a second time.

Author: Chris Gavaler

Chris Gavaler is an associate professor at W&L University, comics editor of Shenandoah, and series editor of Bloomsbury Critical Guides in Comics Studies. He has published two novels: School for Tricksters (SMU 2011) and Pretend I’m Not Here (HarperCollins 2002); and six books of scholarship: On the Origin of Superheroes (Iowa 2015), Superhero Comics (Bloomsbury 2017), Superhero Thought Experiments (with Nathaniel Goldberg, Iowa 2019), Revising Fiction, Fact, and Faith (with Nathaniel Goldberg, Routledge 2020), Creating Comics (with Leigh Ann Beavers, Bloomsbury 2021), and The Comics Form (Bloomsbury forthcoming). His visual work appears in Ilanot Review, North American Review, Aquifer, and other journals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: